![]() ![]() (Yeah yeah I know it's the accelerator chip shenanigans but still =) ) Sure, these data may or may not reflect practical reality, but its still fun to sort the list by iso or EV and to see the pentax "entry level aps-c" K70 before ANY canon camera at all (including FFs), just one nikon (the DS) and the K1 II on 5th place beaten only by MFs. ** My pet peeve is comparing performance at a particular ISO with the inference that the numbers mean the same across brands.they don't. It is the choice of those values that heavily influence capture character. * All data are scaled at least to arbitrary clipping values for black and white as part of the A/D conversion. They are also widely cited and debated on digital photography forums when subjects such as base ISO come up, though it is often not clear what the charts actually say.** (Actively wondering why a tech-savvy site would continue to use characters that render as � ?)įWIW, P2P is followed closely by PentaxRumors and associated rumors sites as a source of a steady trickle of rumorable information. The complex part is how he infers NR, scaling, and so on from a set of numbers since the data are essentially opaque with no explicit clues as to what modifications have been applied in the A/D conversion and initial scaling to 12 or 14 bit digital.* For the patient, he includes a primer on the P2P site: The simple part is that Bill Claff works from the numeric data stored in the RAW files for captures done under standard conditions. He deserves many thanks.Yes, he is definitely serious.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |